Michael Tubbs, editor of Research Investments, discusses how many actively managed funds manage to outperform the market on a regular basis, citing research from the USA and UK. In both studies, less than 3% of funds managed to show sustained outperformance.
Please share this content using any of the share buttons below. Please see this page for guidelines on embedding videos and other content in your own website or online marketing.
Video blog: only 1% of fund managers consistently beat the market. Are they skilful or just lucky?
Pensions Institute: New evidence on Mutual Fund Performance
Hymans Robertson report into the performance and cost of the Local Government Pension Scheme
Video blog: the report that lays bare the futility of active fund management
Monkeys move in on the active vs. passive debate
Video blog: how to get what you don't pay for
The top cat of stock-picking
Passive sense in exciting times
Video blog: How the wrong investment could cost you £150,000
Beating the market and why active funds rarely do so
Why are active funds so much more popular than passive?
Do investors buy and sell too often?
Why aren't there more investors like Warren Buffett?
The hidden costs of active investing
Why you don't get what you pay for
Do active fund managers invest their own money in active funds?
Why is it so hard to pick the next star fund manager?
How are active managers handling market volatility?
Why does the industry want active investing to be the norm?
Is it easy to pick the next star fund manager?
Why you shouldn't pay an active investment manager
How do passive funds compare to active funds?
What impact do charges have?